Crypto casino deposit history
connecting Calendar periods in UTC · frozen once a period ends- 33 casinos
- 355 labelled wallets
- 10 chains read
- updated —
Deposits, withdrawals, net flow and reserves for every calendar month, quarter, half-year and year since tracking began, with each casino’s share and rank in the period and the biggest transfers of the period. A period is frozen once it ends; the Trends view shows how the share of deposits by chain and coin, the stablecoin share, the average deposit and network fees have moved day by day.
Casinos by deposits, last 24 hours
- Stake $54.4M
- Roobet $19.1M
- Gamdom $12.5M
- Rainbet $12.3M
- Vave $8.3M
- Shuffle $7.8M
- BitStarz $5.4M
- Duel $5.0M
- Betpanda $3.4M
- Sportsbet.io / Bitcasino $1.6M
- 1win $1.4M
- Stake.US $1.3M
- BetFury $1.3M
- 500 Casino $1.2M
- BC.Game $1.2M
- Toshi.bet $1.1M
- Rollbit $1.1M
- Razed $1.1M
- Thrill $932K
- Cloudbet $904K
- Gamba $828K
- Yeet $756K
- MetaWin $752K
- Winna $708K
- Dicey $419K
- Solcasino $386K
- Shock $181K
- CoinCasino $152K
- Shuffle US $129K
- Chips.gg $96K
- Whale.io $39K
- Acebet $0
- Duelbits $0
As of 9 Oct 2026, 00:00 UTC.
These are transfers into and out of public casino wallets, read from the chains themselves and valued in dollars at the hour they happened. They cover only the wallets we can attribute, so deposits are a lower bound; withdrawals can include a casino moving its own money, so net flow is not profit, and the house take is an estimate with a range. Every wallet and rule is on the data page. For what we think of each casino read the casino reviews, and if deposits are something you are trying to cut down, our responsible gambling guide is the place to start.
Casino deposit history FAQ
How far back does the history go?
To the day tracking began on each chain, which the chain table on the data page gives. Periods are calendar months, quarters, half-years and years in UTC. A period that began before tracking did is marked as partly tracked with the number of days covered, and the period still running is marked too; a change against the period before is only shown when both are complete. A casino added to the board later appears from the period in which its wallets were first read.
Why does the count of depositing addresses say “about”?
Because the history is built from one small summary per casino per day, kept for good, while the single transfers behind it are kept in full for about five weeks and then let go. The summary holds exact totals, counts, the split by chain and coin, the biggest transfers of the day and a compact sketch of the different addresses that deposited. Sketches from many days can be merged, so a month or a year can still say about how many separate addresses deposited, normally within a few percent, while the dollar figures stay exact.
Can a finished period change?
Very little. A period is frozen once it ends and its summaries are stored. If a transfer for a finished day turns up later, for example because a casino wallet was labelled after the fact or a chain’s history was read further back, it is added to that day’s totals once and no more. Coin prices are fixed at the hour of each transfer, so a later price move never rewrites an old month. What does change over time is the set of wallets we know about, which is why older periods are more likely than recent ones to be understated.
What does the Trends view show?
How the market is changing, day by day: the share of deposits arriving on each chain and in each coin, the share made in stablecoins against coins whose price moves, and the average deposit on complete days. Below that, what a deposit costs in network fees: the going rate for one transfer on each chain, read from the chains about every half hour, and for each casino the fee weighted by the chains its deposits actually arrive on, so you can see the cheapest way in.
Why do month-on-month comparisons need care?
Three things move the figures besides players. Coin prices change the dollar value of deposits made in volatile coins. Wallets labelled later add volume to recent months that older months never had. And a chain that was behind for part of a period leaves it a little short, which the chain table records. Compare complete periods with complete periods, read the stablecoin share alongside the totals, and treat a partly tracked period as a floor rather than a figure.